The article discusses how the recent US presidential debate highlighted the lack of importance of cryptocurrency issues to both voters and politicians. Despite the crypto industry's efforts to portray itself as a relevant and pressing concern, the debate showed that neither the American public nor the presidential candidates care much about crypto.
The author points out that the presidential debates typically cover the issues that polling shows are most important to voters, such as immigration, healthcare, the economy, and climate change. However, crypto was not mentioned even once during the debate, revealing that it is not seen as a priority by either the candidates or the electorate.
The article suggests that this is because, for the most part, politicians are more concerned with remaining in office than anything else, regardless of party affiliation. The author argues that it takes a certain type of person and ego to want to hold elected office, and that such individuals are often reluctant to give up the stage once they ascend to it.
The article also discusses the financial aspect of politics, noting that politicians need donations to stay in office. It cites the example of former President Donald Trump attending a Bitcoin conference and making lofty promises, but argues that this was primarily a fundraising ploy rather than a genuine concern for crypto.
The information provided in this article is for informational and educational purposes only, based on news and sources gathered from the internet. This content should not be considered as investment advice, financial guidance, or a suggestion to buy or sell any digital assets. Before making any financial decisions, we recommend consulting with a professional financial advisor and conducting your own research. The author and the blog are not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from using this content.
Comments